Skip to main content

Our publications

Reports

Report - Social Cohesion Policies

Report - Social Cohesion Policies

13/02/13

Two years, between September 2010 and April 2012, the Centre for Strategic Analysis (CAS) and the Directorate General of Social Cohesion (CRD) organized a series of public seminars on fourteen instruments and actors of social cohesion policies . This report presents the result of reflections produced on this occasion.

The social cohesion policies
and instruments Actors

Concerns about social cohesion are, with the recent economic crises, a special significance. In addition to rising inequality, many fault lines weaken the cement companies worked by European individualism. According to a recent barometer, only 38% of our citizens believe that French society gives everyone the place it deserves. In addition to the dropout phenomenon most vulnerable populations, which forces us to rethink policies to support the decommissioning sense affects a growing proportion of the population, especially among the middle classes, who feel victimized developments they mastered more: contraction of the job market, high housing prices, persistent discrimination mechanisms, growth of social insecurity, etc.. These phenomena fueling the idea of ​​fragmentation of the French society.

Two years, between September 2010 and April 2012, the Centre for Strategic Analysis (CAS) and the Directorate General of Social Cohesion (CRD) organized a series of public seminars on fourteen instruments and actors of social cohesion policies . This report presents the result of reflections produced on this occasion from a triple ambition

The first is to inform public decision by the contributions of more recent research. It is an essential dimension. Adaptation of cohesion
social transformations that we just mentioned can be realized from aboveground diagnostics. Teams and those of CAS DGCS thus ensured that each seminar is based on the contribution of academics. More than a hundred experts and speakers at our various meetings.

The second aim is to highlight examples of good practices. On each theme, we have done work identifying local innovations. Our belief is that the power of example - when it is evaluated - helps remove institutional barriers that may face economic and social cohesion policies. Identify new methods emerging actors, institutional arrangements originals: such was the motto of our teams.

The third goal, in line with previous, focused on the international dimension of our work. diagnosis halftone that we have established the state of social cohesion is not just France. Go look elsewhere, this is first that the problems there are often a similar way. But also realize that institutional responses differ significantly. In thus highlighting various configurations, this report
will be in no doubt as a working tool for all professionals acting in favor of social cohesion.


Work coordinated by Christophe Fourel (Directorate General of Social Cohesion) and William Malochet (Centre for Strategic Analysis)

Archives

Centre d’analyse stratégique